Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
As an econ major in the UC system, the concept of externalities calibrated my worldview. Externalities include all the consequences of economic activity.
The University of California was like a talisman in my life. UCSD, then UCLA. Economics, micro, macro, monetary policy, Keynesian economics, externalities, the multiplier, german, italian, international econ, courses on the environment, it was fascinating, enlightening and so much FUN.
Amazing times, fantastic schools. And decades ahead of the curve. Sustainability was the core element of my educational journey even if I didn't realize it at the time.
-Joe Sulentic
Externalities are consequences of actions between economic actors.
Externalities occur when the true social costs of a good are not reflected in its market price. If the price is artificially low, economics explains we over consume the good.
The externalities associated with over consuming energy is global warming. The externalities of over consuming plastic are the deaths of millions of living creatures in the oceans.
Externalities of a warmer climate are less snow. Less snow cannot be good for snow leopards.
Big cats, sharks, birds of prey, butterflies, bees, the ocean, trees. Why trash the place? It's worth saving.
Example 1: Gasoline
Are the true social costs of gasoline represented in its market price? Is the cost of a gallon what you pay at the pump?
The oil companies are highly adept at producing gasoline. They are equally adept at foisting their products' clean up costs onto the general public.
The price at the pump represents the costs of converting oil into gasoline and getting it to the pump. The price does not include the costs associated with removing the carbon from the air after it is burned.
When the gas burns, carbon emissions result. Excess carbon heats the atmosphere and induces climate change. A 19 mpg car emits approximately one pound of carbon per mile.
Negative externalities associated with gasoline consumption include carbon emissions, smog, air pollution, respiratory issues, and climate change.
Negative externalities of gasoline production include wars, oil spills, polluted water, dead wildlife, and EPA superfund sites (refineries).
An electric vehicle (EV) eliminates the oil side of the equation, but if the electricity generated to power the vehicle is not clean, there are still negative externalities on the production side. The consumption side is much cleaner, however. When driven, the EVs have no carbon emissions from their exhaust systems.
Example 2: Electricity
Are the true social costs of electricity represented in its market price?
Much like gasoline, the price we pay for electricity is related to the cost of producing the electricity, but has little to do with the unintended consequences, or externalities, associated with its production and consumption.
About 63% of electricity is generated from fossil fuels, primarily coal and natural gas. https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3
The average household in the U.S. uses approximately 10,000 kilowatt hours (kW/hr) per year. To produce one kW/hr from coal requires 2.2 lbs of coal and emits 1.4 lbs of carbon when it is burned. So the average household in the U.S. emits 14,000 lbs of carbon every year just to keep the lights on! Add approximately .5-1.0 lbs of carbon for every mile driven and the scale of the carbon problem becomes clearer.
The negative externalities of fracked natural gas include devastating effects on groundwater. Water and highly toxic chemical agents are injected at extreme pressures to "fracture" underground rock and release the natural gas. The groundwater table is rendered unusable. How can we justify destroying our groundwater to reduce the price of our energy bills by a few percent?
Does that strike you as crazy?
The multiplier is an economic term that relates to how often a dollar turns in the economy. The higher the number, the more beneficial for the economy.
Made in USA = the highest multipliers.
If you look up economic multiplier online, the results may be skewed in terms of how OFTEN the government spending multiplier is referenced.
Consumption + Investment + Government spending (C+I+G) is a way to measure or predict the overall size of the economy.
C+I+G is a core tenet of macroeconomics and pioneered by noted economist, John Meynard Keynes.
Think of numbers (multipliers) in front of each:
6.82 * C
2.14 * I
1.97 * G
Consumption
What we buy. Consumers and Corporations.
If you buy something Made in USA, your purchase:
If you buy something Made in Another Country, your purchase:
Investment
A theoretical return in the future. You save money in a bank and that money is loaned to a business and the economy improves because the business hired people or bought equipment, etc.
Another potential investment would be tax policy. Cut taxes. Put more money in the hands of the individual or corporations. How the money is spent has a big impact on the multiplier.
Is it going to the employees or to the CEO so he can upgrade the house in the Hamptons and his use of NetJets?
Government
When the government spends money, there is a multiplier involved.
We build roads and employ construction crews. Those persons spend money in their communities and generate multiple streams of tax revenues. We buy drones and B-2 bombers from Northrop Grumman and support its employees, suppliers, R&D, etc. Those dollars are spent and circulated around the country. The highest G multipliers bolster tax revenues.
Other Considerations
It's not only about the money. What about things we want that don't show up on the economic scorecard? Clean water, clean air, a biodiverse planet? Our health!
The multiplier turbocharges the economy. The higher the number, the more lives impacted.
Manufacturing jobs have some of the highest multipliers in the economy. Wealth is created. An example: six dollars worth of inputs create nine dollars worth of outputs.
Our plan is to manufacture in the United States utilizing world class talent from across the globe. Eventually, we will consider building turbines in other parts of the world for their respective markets.
What is the true cost of making clean electricity, manufactured in America?
We intend to find out.
Wind and solar are the main renewable games in town. View them as complementary, not competing, technologies. Some locales are predominately windy, some predominately sunny.
NASA is an amazing resource. Satellite imagery shows the earth as a living, breathing entity and demonstrates how the planet aspirates.
In the spring and summer, the earth absorbs carbon more effectively due to foliage. Carbon numbers are higher during the winter.
Solar is less effective in the winter because the sun is lower in the sky and the days are shorter. In the winter, wind power is stronger because cold air has greater force (density).
Investments in renewable energy lead to infrastructure cost reductions. Think of that from a societal perspective. Investments are made now and in the future costs go down. More resources are available for other uses.
The input cost for our energy generating system is free. The volatility of oil and gas prices are eliminated.
Our aim is to generate electricity at a cost significantly less than the current market price. In certain branding scenarios, the price of electricity can approach zero if companies are willing to use our turbine as a source of advertising. Advertising that creates energy, fuels our lifestyle, and heals the planet. A better social bargain.
Be an Alchemist
photo credits: Snow Leopard Trust, NASA.
Copyright © 2024 Carbon-Free Energy, LLC - All Rights Reserved.